Tomorrow (Tuesday) we start administering the NAPLAN tests to all of the grade 3 and 5 kids. At least, those who haven’t been exempted under certain grounds such as intellectual disabilities and stuff like that. Oh, and not to those kids who aren’t actually at school either. Apparently there’s a catch up day on Friday for any kids that miss it, but that’s another issue later on. I’ve told the kids to inform their parents that there’s no homework this week because with all four of these fairly weighty tests the kids are going to be going through, they deserve a bit of slack and a week off. So do I.What’s the NAPLAN? It’s the National Assessment Program Literacy And Numeracy test. Last year it was called the AIM test, but for some reason now that it’s a national test and not just a Victorian one they saw fit to rename it and chose that monstrosity of a name as it’s new label. I tried explaining this to the kids last week when we were talking about it, but they wouldn’t have a bar of it!
‘What a stupid name! NAPLAN! Why couldn’t they just call it AIM again! At least that made a word! How stupid! etc etc’
While trying to appear all professional, I just couldn’t manage it and basically had to concede to the kids that, hey, I fully agree with you. It’s the same thing as last time with a new silly name. Like a change of government, in many respects, eh? Same stuff, different turkey.
Anyway… it’s happening tomorrow and I’ll be running the grade threes through their paces. The grade fours… well, they can do most of it as well. Why just collect data on my threes when I can collect data on my fours at the same time? It all goes towards assessment evidence for their reports anyway. Accountability, that’s what it’s called
‘Why did you give my son a bad mark in his maths??‘
‘Have a glance at this then, eh?’
‘Oh… yeah. Fair enough. He’s not that bright, eh?’

A Melbourne psychologist, in today’s Herald Sun newspaper, has ‘hit out’ at the tests, labelling them a waste of time and possibly harmful to the kids who sit them. According to his findings, they are ‘very bad at predicting individual achievements’ and ‘don’t measure what they are supposed to measure’. I don’t know if they’re quite a complete waste of time, but I do agree to an extent that you can’t base your kid’s academic abilities on this one test, however enormous it may be. The results the parents get back later in the year show a snapshot of their kid’s abilities, in that particular subject, on that particular day. If the kid works well with official tests and so forth, they’ll probably do well. If they’re a kid who looks at a big test and you can almost see their brain melt and ooze out through their ears while they’re sitting there, then they probably won’t do particularly well just now. I find it more useful to treat these tests, on a parental level, as a guide for whereabouts your kid is sitting against the rest of the state (or now, nation) and go from there. If you have issues or concerns, then approach the teacher and you’ll probably find there are reasons for particular scores and wander home somewhat more happy with the situation.
It’s one test on one day. If the kid crashes out on a spelling test once through the year, you wouldn’t get too worked up. If the kid’s not quite ready to work on the NAPLAN day, then they’re not going to do so well either. It won’t stuff up their entire year.
To be a little more serious for a moment though - tomorrow the kids are faced with two tests. Language Conventions (which has always been called Spelling and Punctuation until that changed this year) and Writing. Where do you put the talking marks? Would you use a question mark, a comma, a full stop or an exclamation mark at the end of this sentence? Which word best fits in the hole in the sentence? Stuff like that. A few spelling activities at the end and there you have it. I don’t know yet whether they’ll have the dictation task now. Will have to see about that one.
After recess they get to sit down for the Writing part - this year it’s a narrative or story, but that’s nothing new - it’s always a narrative. We’ve found that narratives are the hardest pieces for kids to write. If they aren’t reading lots of books or having them read to them, they just don’t have the imagination or grasp of language and sentence structures to know how to construct their own. Give them a piece where they can retell what happened to them last week, they can rabbit on all day! But ask them to write a story, and a lot of them either go into meltdown or hand in something that’s, as nicely put as possible, a repetitive, bland piece of work that shows little plot or character development. There are always a few stand outs, and a few that nicely surprise you, but you can usually pick the kids who haven’t had that background of stories poured into them growing up.
Parents! Read to your kids! As much as you can! Feed their imaginations!!
We do our best, but you can only spread so much imagination food around 25 kids, eh?
Wednesday morning they’ll all back again, this time for the Reading test. It checks comprehension mainly, which we’ve found is something the kids don’t always have by the time they reach grade three. In the first three years of school they generally work out how to say all the words, and many can read very fluently by the time they get to us at this level. They just don’t always have the comprehension that needs to go along with it. I know the teachers of these levels have been working more on that these last few years now, at least at our school, so that’s becoming less of a problem. This part of the test though, is one of the two that we find the kids will generally bomb out on. A booklet filled with various texts they’re to read then answer multiple choice questions about. If there’s a place they’ll freeze up and stress out, this is the one.
Finally, on Thursday morning, it’s into Numeracy. One last test, this time covering just about everything to do with maths. Like reading, if they’re going to bomb, it’s often in this one too. Often it’s just that the questions are asked in styles the kids aren’t used to and they just don’t understand what’s being asked. If we can get around to them (we’re allowed to read the questions for them in Numeracy but not in the others) then more often than not they pick up what they have to do and they’re right. You can’t always get around to each kid every time though.
We used to be able to do the tests on the specific days but at whatever time suited our programs. Apparently that was frowned upon because kids might then leave their classrooms at recess and talk about the questions with mates who hadn’t yet sat it, who’d then go in after recess and answer those questions when they sat the test. So now every school has to administer this test at the same times as every other school. Now… if you’re like me, you’ll see one major piece of silliness in this. What primary school kid in his right mind is going to sit through an hour long test, then go outside at recess for a well deserved run around and a bit of fun, and spend that time talking with his mates about the questions?
Whoever that kid is, he needs a good talking to about being a kid, eh?
But that leads to this last point I only just heard about today. Apparently, in case kids miss one of the days and therefore one of the tests, they can catch up and do that part on Friday. Obviously there’s no problem with talking to their mates about the test if it was a few days ago, eh? I know I’m being a little silly with this point, but it struck me as pedantic and yet somewhat obsolete.
Not to worry though. When we finally get through it all, despite this apparent obesity problem, I’m giving them all a lolly or two. They’ll deserve it.
So will I.